DAILY PAPER REVIEW

20190807_Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors

1. Title, Journal and Authors

Title: Global Estimates of Fine Particulate Matter using a Combined Geophysical-Statistical Method with Information from Satellites, Models, and Monitors

Journal: Environmental science & Technology

Authors: Aaron van Donkelaar*, Randall V. Martin†‡, Michael Brauer§, N. Christina Hsu, Ralph A. Kahn, Robert C. Levy, Alexei Lyapustin, Andrew M. Sayer∥⊥, and David M. Winker#

Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. Canada

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States

§School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T1Z3, Canada

NASA Goddard Space Fighter Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United States

Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research, Universities Space Association, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, United states

# NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23665, United States

 

2. Summary

The objective of this paper is to estimate the global PM2.5 concentrations with a combination of various information from satellite, simulation, and monitoring by applying a GWR (Geographically Weighted Regression).

 

AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) was calibrated by using the simulation results and the satellite observations based on ground-based monitoring. Then, GWR adjusted satellite data (R2=0.81) was developed with the simulation results.

 

The satellite data were obtained by adapting the adequate retrieval algorithms. The simulation was done by GEOS-Chem, a transport model. Ground-based monitoring was carried out with AERONET data.

 

The GWR adjusted satellite data and GBD (Global Burden Disease) data were compared to estimate the global PM2.5 concentrations. As a result, it was verified that the global population-weighted annual mean PM2.5 concentration of 32.6 μg/m3 was three times higher than the WHO guideline of 10 μg/m3. Especially, the concentrations of Asia and Africa were estimated very highly.

 

There were too many areas to affect the uncertainties of the simulation, resulting from both sparse ground-based monitoring and challenging conditions for retrieval and simulation.

 

3. Contact

Dae Seong Jeong / Intern student

 

Environmental Systems Engineering Lab.

School of Environmental Science & Engineering

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology

1 Oryong-dong Buk-gu Gwangju, 500-712, Korea

 

Phone : +82-10-2003-7860

 

E-mail : jeongds92@gist.ac.kr

첨부 (0)